Publication of the week: Dr James Slater and Professor bob Watt

Slater, J. & b. Watt, “In defence of democracy: The criminalisation of impersonation”,  Election Law Journal: Rules, Politics, and Policy, June 2015, 14(2): 165-185; doi:10.1089/elj.2015.0307

This article offers a philosophical justification for the criminalisation of voting as another person (impersonation or, in English law, personation) in public elections by arguing that it involves wrongdoing in the form of anti-democratic behaviour and that the failure to criminalise it will harm the public good of electoral integrity. With regard to harm, the article argues that the failure to criminalise impersonation will eventually result in widespread impersonation, such widespread impersonation undermining electoral integrity, itself instrumental to a number of public goods reflecting the democratic character of any given polity. Finally, the article completes the case for criminalisation by arguing that, in any given jurisdiction, it may be neither effective nor desirable for the entire burden of preventing impersonation to fall onto the civil law, with the result that the criminalisation of impersonation can serve a useful complementary role to the civil law in maintaining electoral integrity.

Read the full article on the Election Law Journal website.

James Slater is Senior Lecturer in Law at Buckingham and Director of the Part-Time LLB, and bob Watt is Professor of Law.