Publication of the week: Denning Law Journal 23 (2011)

The Denning Law Journal is a general, peer-reviewed legal journal that publishes original articles, book reviews and case notes that seek to promote the values cherished by Lord Denning. It was founded in 1985, and now has an international editorial board. It is published by the University of Buckingham Press and edited by Professor Susan Edwards. The Publishing Manager is Christopher M. Woodhead.

The 2011 volume includes a number of articles and commentaries by University of Buckingham staff and visiting staff.  There are also contributions by legal practitioners from around the world, and by academics at Birmingham and London South Bank Universities, LSE  and University College Dublin.

The full text of the new volume is available on University computers via Ingenta Connect (external link).  The main articles and commentaries are listed below; the volume also contains book reviews.

Author Title Pages
Articles
Beloff; Michael J. A View from the Bar 1-28
Welch, Tim; Haider, Huma; Meenagh, Martin; M’Boge, Yassin Witness Anonymity at the International Criminal Court: Due Process for Defendants, Witnesses or Both? 29-46
Kirby, Michael
Of Advocates, Drunks and Other Players: Plain Tales from Australia
47-64
Scutt, Jocelynne A.
Police, Prosecution, Courts and Wartime Demonstrations: Adela Pankhurst in the Australian High Court
65-91
Pearce, Robert Privacy, Superinjunctions and Anonymity “Selling My Story Will Sort My Life Out” 92-130
Sargent, Sarah
Trapped in Legal Discourse: Transracial Adoption in the United States and England
131-162
Current commentary
Grimal, Francis; Melling, Graham British Action in Libya 2011: The Lawful Protection of Nationals Abroad? 165-177
Case commentaries
Shearman, Jennifer; Pearce, Robert
Exempting a Trustee for Gross Negligence
181-191
Welstead, Mary
Families Need Fathers – the Limits to Litigation
192-201
Egede, Hephzibah
Shrouded Gender and Reproductive Issues in Child Welfare and Protection Proceedings
202-226
Halladay, John Recent Problems in Undue Influence 227-235